| |||
| |||
|
12/21/2010 3:25:53 PM | |
I will tell you something about slaves, slavery, and husbandry, slave: See, too many of you think that if a woman owns a slave that means she has to provide for his sexual service with her own body. Well, honey, that is just not how it usually went, per the history books, and that is not how it goes here.If I fall in love with a man, and he is in love with me, we will be married and I'll do things to him that will make his toes curl, because, yes, I do love sex, very, very much.But, slaves are not lovers, friends, or husbands. They are also not animals. They are something else, altogether.Because they are workers, like the animals, they must be taken care of, and that includes taking care of their sexual needs, if those needs are getting in the way of their being able to work, or getting the owner down with all the mopey behavior.Because they are human, like the owner, they will not simply be castrated like an animal might be. They might be left out in the field to rut, if the owner feels it is appropriate, though.I do not feel that is appropriate. I do, however, feel that the long standing traditions of marrying slaves to other slaves, or the slave having a free born spouse who knows that the slave will be serving and only has time to give them when the work is done, is perfectly reasonable as a solution to the dilemma of slaves who cannot control their sexual appetites.It was common practice, in 19th century slavery, for an owner to pair two slaves who were already on the same plantation, for the sake of the slaves breeding. Or, the owner might have gone to buy a slave for the slave he already owned to marry and breed with. Or, sometimes, they would simply seek out other owners who had slaves, and make agreements that the male and female slaves would be married to each other, with the owners of the female slaves keeping the babies.Now, I don't want to go that far! I have no interest in enslaving children or anyone who is not capable of making a firm decision that they wish to serve me. So, don't even start asking questions about that.It was less common, but, still, a perfectly acceptable practice, to allow slaves, either on the same plantation as each other or on different ones, to marry for love. Often, their owners provided them with a home separate from other slaves for the purpose of having the comfort of family, hearth and home, such as there could be comfort in their situation. If the slaves were on different plantations and fell in love, sometimes their owners would arrange to buy the other slave, because, they wanted their slaves to be happy and productive people.So, don't come at me with a lot of gobblety-gook as to how I must milk you, sit on your face, allow you to lick or suck anything, or etc. and try to rationalize that it is what makes consensual slavery into true slavery.Uh uh, honey! If you are truly a slave, you will jump when I say jump; you will dance when I say dance; you will work when I tell you to work; and, you will be allowed to marry (or ordered to marry) whom I choose to allow you to marry. But, my body is my own and I am no one's slave, so I don't have to do you!So, keep that in mind. No, I am not going to force you to marry a slave girl or anyone else that doesn't strike your fancy, slave boy. That's not what I mean, because I am not that sort of person. Just saying, if you need sex, romance, etc. I may help you get it, but, I don't have to provide it from my own body.IF you want to be this sort of slave, write 'gerbil frumpkin' into a message and send it to me. |
12/21/2010 2:51:32 PM | |
If you do not want pain, then do not seek an owner who will want to give it to you. That is my advice to you. Me, personally, yes, I can give pain, but, I do not get turned on by the idea of torturing people. If I was going to whip someone, they would have earned it by their own bad behavior and it would have been seriously bad behavior. Or, perhaps, at first, I might give them a whipping, just to put them in mind of the fact that I can and will do so, so that when I tell them what not to do if they do not wish to experience it, they will have a clear understandng. Perhaps. In truth, I would just as soon have slaves who did their work well, were polite and never needed correction at all. Some I have known have come darned close to that, so I know it is possible. Unfortunately, most of them WANT to be treated badly. |
12/21/2010 2:48:33 PM | |
'For sure, I could work and bring home the cash, but then there are even better slaves than me out there. My qualities comes from the need of serve, the need to please. I will turn myself inside out to know that I have brought pleasure to my Owner with no thoughts of myself. ' Absolutely beautiful! I keep trying to explain this to potential slaves, that the most important thing for a slave to have is the willingness to serve. Mind you, I haven't the resources to accept slaves who do not work for wages BUT they seem to think that if they can offer some exhorbitant sum per week that means they are the better slave and they can play tradesies, getting me to change my hard limits for hard cash. Whereas they look down on slaves who, yes, make significantly less money, but, who think of the person they are hoping to serve, listen to them, help them do things, etc. The best slave I've come across on this site is not relocatable, has no money to spare,and is making me no offers to serve me, because we both know that we do not have enough nickles to rub together to make a bus ticket appear or anything. However, he knew I was tired, one night, and swamped with work, and, instead of demanding my attention as the other 'slaves' were doing, he asked me to allow him to help with the typing. He did help, too, quite a bit, even though I had to take time to train him. And, that is why he is the best slave - he's proven he is polite, thoughtful, trainable to task, with no need to be 'broken' into slavery. He wants to be that way, and so he is. Thank you for the inspirational words.Persons who want to be considered as a slave (for me) should send me a message, now, that says 'Pooter-based twinkie dogs' at the beginning of it. |
No comments:
Post a Comment