Sex

Let me explain something about sex:For me, it is an extension of love, not punishment or cruelty, and not something to be done with mere objects, animals, subhumans, or in a purely selfish manner. If you seek to have sex with me, without it being an extension of love, then it is by force and oppression, as, otherwise, it is against my nature. A slave does not seek to force or oppress anyone, do they? Let me explain something about love: There are four kinds, and many variations are possible within those kinds, as to how one shall live. One form of love is purely selfish and it says 'You do things for me, you give me things, and, so, I love you.'  I will definitely feel that for a good slave, if no other kind. One form of love is pure madness, of the mind, but, leading the body and spirit along. It keeps me awake at night, pining for a touch, a glance. Anything is possible, when this love holds sway. I could sit at your feet, you could sit at mine, we could both sit on the floor and roll about freely, or both sit close and cuddle. When I feel this love, I stay in love, until the person I feel it for kills it dead with acts of disrespect, insults, lies, or simply moving past it, losing it, and so no longer giving response. Otherwise, it waxes and wanes, but, it does remain.That is the sort of love I need to be in, for sex to be remotely interesting. When I love this way, I am your slave and you are mine, not by contract, but, by nature. We own each other. We do for each other. Now, am I going to think a person I feel that way about is inferior? Want to treat him with cruelty? Despise him? Forbid him to talk to me, send him away when company comes over, and all that? Hardly!  He cannot be my slave, in that way. He cannot live by the same rules and restrictions as other slaves. It would do me serious harm for it to be so.Harm? Yes. A woman wants to be loved, wants the man to speak from his heart, wants signs of affection in small gestures, impromptu presents, and she wants to give the same. It would not only destroy the possibilities of that happening, but, it would cheapen and make a lie of anything of that nature if it did occur. After all, a slave who acts a fool for love is a slave who should be beaten and reoriented to his work; and a slave who is allowed to make impromptu gestures is, after all, only doing it by order and permission. It means nothing, unless it is done by free will.So, again: I do not have sex with slaves. It is not because I am against sex, or slaves, it is because owning your lover means never being pursued, wooed, won, or allowed to give to them as freely as you wish for them to give, and take. I want romance - slavery is to practical and full of rules for romance. Love makes us slaves, but, of a different sort.